谢菲尔德代写Essay 公共生活中

2017-01-16 09:06

Some scholars did a lot of research about the performances in public life. Talcott Parsons believed that norms help to hold society together. Our interactions are ordered, in another way to say. What’s more, some scholars put forward that our interactions were formulaic but also we also kept creativity and flexibility in following the rules. The participation framework and the production format are also included in our analysis. Footing is such thing that when the speaker changes the capacity in which they speak, they change their footing and this can in turn change the capacity in which the other participants at a gathering are present. A change of their footing means a change in the production format and it will cause a change in the participation framework.
The discussion about this issue is very intense. The host and guests were all very excited about this issue. At first, Julie answered the audience’s question as the representative of the opposition, but her answer was not clear and pleasing. So the host and other guests argued with her. What Julie did in their interactions were explaining and arguing. She kept talking about it was the immigration policy’s fault and it was the government’s mess which caused such things to happen. She didn’t get the question’s point well and didn’t answer the question directly, even she ignored the host’s question and kept going on her own topic. It seemed that she didn’t have a good logic at first.

谢菲尔德代写Essay 公共生活中

一些学者对公共生活中的表现做了大量的研究。Talcott Parsons认为，规范有助于维持社会稳定。我们的相互作用是有序的，以另一种方式说。更重要的是，一些学者提出，我们的互动是公式化的同时也保持创造性和灵活性在以下规则。参与框架和生产格式也包括在我们的分析。基础就是这样的东西，当说话者改变他们说话的能力时，他们就改变了立场，这反过来又改变了其他参与者在聚会中的能力.。改变他们的基础意味着生产方式的改变，这将导致参与框架的改变.。关于这个问题的讨论非常激烈。主人和客人都非常兴奋这个问题。起初，朱莉作为反对党的代表回答听众的问题，但她的回答并不清楚和令人愉快.。主人和其他客人和她争论。朱莉在互动中所做的是解释和争论。她一直在谈论这是移民政策的错误，是政府的混乱造成了这样的事情发生.。她没有很好地回答问题，也没有直接回答问题，甚至忽略了主持人的问题，继续她自己的话题.。起初她似乎没有一个好的逻辑。