纽约代写Essay:教育的评论

2017-05-28 00:43

另一个批评剑桥对教育的评论是，报告涉及的概念，你是或你是反对测试。然而，在进一步审查剑桥的审查，我注意到，该报告希望“一扫”目前的SAT在六年在英国-已经发生在威尔士。我同意剑桥评论在这里提到的，因为SAT取消在威尔士已经让孩子们少了担心和压力较小时，搬到中学。shuttermonkey（2009）写在一个讨论板，教师可以根据孩子的表现在几个月的观察，客观的评价而不是推测，一个考试。这是关于SAT测试的废除。奇怪的是，当与一系列教师交谈时，他们认为专业标准并没有下降，家长仍然意识到孩子和学校的表现。（南特西岭小学，2009）。事实上，回顾剑桥的提议将意味着更多的测试，但在形式，涵盖了课程的全方位的评价。这种形式不会给学校和教师带来高风险的判断，既不缩小课程，也不限制教学。
纽约代写Essay:教育的评论
Another criticism against the Cambridge review on education is that the report deals with the notion that you are either for or you are against testing. However on further inspection of the Cambridge Review I have noticed that the report wants to "sweep away" the current SAT's during year six in England- as has already happened in Wales. I agree with what the Cambridge Review mentions here as SAT's abolition in Wales has left children with less worries and less pressure when moving up to secondary school. Shuttermonkey (2009) wrote on a discussion board that teachers can make objective assessments based on children's performance over months of observations and not surmised in one exam. This was in regards to the abolishment of SATs tests. Oddly enough, when speaking to a series of teachers they believe that professional standards have not fallen, and that parents are still aware of child and school performances. (Nant Celyn Primary, 2009).Indeed, the Cambridge Review's proposals would mean more testing, but in a form that covers the full range of the curriculum through assessment. This form would not bring high stake judgements for schools and the teacher, and that neither narrows the curriculum nor constrains teaching.