ASSIGNMENT代写

英国谢菲尔德代写 认知风格

2020-04-15 02:55

人们往往是多维的,因此,可以表现出负面和加强认知风格的生活事件或两者都不。过去的一些研究探讨了认知在抑郁症中的作用,这些研究通常要么在应对抑郁症风险时研究消极的认知风格,要么在抑郁症康复时研究增强认知风格。很少有研究调查两种认知方式在抑郁症康复中的相互作用。第一个关于认知风格的研究集中在认知在抑郁的风险、发展和维持中的作用,消极的认知风格是应对消极生活事件的一种通往抑郁的因果途径。关于抑郁症康复的第二项研究主要考察了积极的生活事件对认知风格的增强,这是一种通过增加希望而导致抑郁症状减少的保护性因素。通过合并这两种研究,Voelz和他的同事(2003)的研究是第一个尝试和检验这一点。他们的研究考察了消极和增强认知风格对住院精神病青年抑郁症康复的相互作用。为了进一步探索这一问题,Haeffel和Vargas(2011)还选择合并这两大主流研究,以便更全面地理解认知在抑郁症中的作用,即抗抑郁能力。Haeffel和Vargas(2011)对大学生进行了一项非临床样本的研究,目的是评估两种认知风格对生活事件反应的相互影响。他们预计,那些认知上易患抑郁症的人,如果他们有一种增强的风格或积极事件的存在,即使是在最近经历的认知风格和生活事件类型的相互作用中,也可能有抗抑郁的能力。
英国谢菲尔德代写 认知风格
People are often multidimensional and as a result, can exhibit both a negative and enhancing cognitive style to life events or neither. Past research studies that have examined the role of cognition in depression have often either examined negative cognitive style when addressing the risk of depression or enhancing cognitive style in the context of recovery to depression. Few studies had examined the interactive role that both cognitive styles can in the recovery of depression. The first line of research on cognitive style focused on the role of cognition in the risk, development, and maintenance of depression with a negative cognitive style in response to negative life events being a causal pathway towards depression. The second line of research on recovery from depression mainly examined enhancing cognitive style in response to positive life events as a protective factor that resulted in the decrease of depressive symptomology through the increase of hopefulness . Through the merging of both lines of research, Voelz and his colleagues (2003) study was the first to try and examine this. Their study examined the interaction effects of both negative and enhancing cognitive styles on the recovery from depression among inpatient psychiatric youth. To further explore this, Haeffel and Vargas (2011) also chose to merge the two main streams of research in order to glean at a more comprehensive understanding of the role of cognition in depression in terms of resiliency against depression. Haeffel and Vargas (2011) conducted a study on a nonclinical sample of college students with the intention of assessing the interactive effects of both cognitive styles in responses to life events. They anticipated that those who were cognitively vulnerable to depression may be resilient to developing depression if they had an enhancing style or the presence of positive events even within the interaction of both cognitive styles and types of life events recently experienced.