西雅图作业代写:舆论制定

2017-04-01 00:30

毫无疑问，媒体是现代舆论制定的主要焦点。这是真的早在Karl Marx（1968:64-65）创作共产党宣言（1848）和德国哲学家指出，“阶级的物质生产方式所支配的控制，同时对精神生产…意味着他们确定每个时代的程度和指南针，他们这样做，在其整个范围内，因此，在其他事情上，他们对自己时代的思想的生产和分配；因此，他们的思想是时代的统治思想。”。但是，如果马克思认为旧的印刷媒体是统治阶级维护其政治和文化权力的控制强大的工具，那么他会在新媒体平台的范围被吓呆了在过去的十五年里，通信产业发生了革命性的变化。数字革命，通过互联网和移动电话的引擎开火，将从后‑战争文化评论员米尔斯赖特‑媒体概念（1957:315）看到“动画分心”为“恒全球房‑新闻“流（Piers Robinson，2002）变形带在任何世界各地的观众解释点事件。这种西方新闻文化的批发转型的累积效应可以从两个方面来看待。它可以被看作是一个积极的现象，即知情的公民可以自由选择从一个几乎无尽的池源以形成自己的意见；反之，相同的发展可以看作是区分负随着电视的饱和度，报纸和互联网产生了一个想法由转出对于2002大选的主要人口–冷漠，这是由于妇女被给予1918的最低得票率。这种双重性，这是媒体研究一直存在的特征，使得许多分析人士，包括David Gauntlett（2002:234），宣布权力的媒体和消费者在更广泛的辩论信息是如何在数字时代的感知。
西雅图作业代写:舆论制定
There is little doubt that the media is the main focus for formulating an opinion in the modern era. This was true as far back as when Karl Marx (1968:64-65) was penning his Communist Manifesto (1848) with the German philosopher noting that, “the class which has the means of material production at its disposal has control at the same time over the means of mental production… they determine the extent and compass of each epoch, they do this in its whole range, hence, among other things, they regulate the production and distribution of the ideas of their age; thus their ideas are the ruling ideas of the epoch.”.However, if Marx believed that the old print media was a powerful tool for the ruling classes to maintain their grip on political and cultural power, then he would have been aghast at the range and scope of the new media platforms that have revolutionized the communications industry in the past fifteen years. The digital revolution, fired by the engines of the Internet and mobile telephony, has transformed the concept of the media from what post‑war cultural commentator Wright‑Mills (1957:315) saw as “an animated distraction” into “a constant flow of global real‑time news” (Piers Robinson, 2002:9) that distorts the audience’s interpretations of events that take place at any point across the globe. The cumulative effect of this wholesale transformation of western news culture can be viewed in one of two ways. It can either be seen as a positive phenomenon whereby the informed citizen is able to choose freely from a virtually endless pool of sources in order to form their opinions; conversely, the same development can be viewed as discernibly negative with the saturation of television, newspapers and the Internet resulting in a largely apathetic population – an idea backed up by the turn out for the 2002 general election, which was the lowest since women were granted the vote in 1918. This sense of duality, which is an ever-present feature of media studies, has led many analysts, including David Gauntlett (2002:234), to proclaim the power of both the media and the consumer within the broader debate on how information is perceived in the digital age.