英国利物浦代写论文:审议过程

2018-10-09 13:07

首先也是最重要的是，约翰·伦诺克斯是一个聪明的人，在整个审议过程中他有明显的优势。与理查德·道金斯相比，他更有口才和口才。伦诺克斯非常直接地回答了所有的问题，并指出道金斯究竟在什么地方游荡。例如，在第五篇论文“没有人需要上帝有道德”中，关于宇宙中的善恶。道金斯立即开始谈论他是如何判断善与恶的，并从一个角度出发仅仅与善与恶有关，而不是如何从物质或能量中证明或发现它。伦诺克斯立即发现道金斯在得出结论时，打破了任何形式的推理。英国利物浦代写论文:审议过程伦诺克斯似乎也很习惯道金斯的书，《上帝的错觉》，以及道金斯会引用的人们。例如，道金斯在谈到自然法则时，误用了大卫·休谟的话。约翰·伦诺克斯指出，休谟不了解因果法则，而因果法则是自然法则的基础。伦诺克斯引用了休谟的话:“你不能从物质和能量中获得道德和伦理.
英国利物浦代写论文:审议过程
First and foremost, John Lennox is an intelligent man and he had obvious advantages throughout the deliberation. He was much more eloquent and well-spoken as compared to Richard Dawkins. Lennox was very direct in answering all of the questions and pointing out exactly where Dawkins was wandering away. For instance, during the 5th thesis, “No one needs God to be moral”, was concerning about good and evil in the universe. Dawkins instantaneously started talking about how he attains at judgements of good and evil and went off on an angle just having to do with good and evil, but not how one justifies or discovers it from matter or energy. Lennox immediately distinguished where Dawkins broke any form of reasoning to decide on at his conclusions.Furthermore, Lennox also seemed to be very accustomed with Dawkins’ book, The God Delusion, as well as the people Dawkins would quote. For example, Dawkins had misused David Hume’s quote in the connection of the laws of nature. John Lennox pointed out that Hume did not have the understanding of the laws of causes and effects, which served as the basis of the laws of nature. Lennox quoted Hume, “You can’t derive morality and ethics from matter and energy