英国哈佛代写Essay:新兴的研究领域

2017-05-05 01:55

作为一个新兴的研究领域，当人们宣称高等教育是一个研究领域时，就产生了许多挑战和问题。有些人喜欢Dennis Mileti（2003）可以很容易地宣布：由于人们谈论急救管理作为一门学科，因此它是飞利浦（2003:2）。”。在定义高等教育作为一个研究领域有问题，将从事我们多年来，因为他们有多年前。立场文件将被写入，观点提出质疑，辩论进入课程委员会、草坪战役发动研究生委员会”菲利浦斯（2003:2）。辩论有时会减少到谁的“研究领域”的定义要使用的问题。飞利浦（2003:2）认为，我们需要停下来审视过去，思考未来。我们与高等教育作为一个研究领域和方向是什么，有多远，走。我们需要回头看看我们来自哪里。据古德乔尔德（ND）高等教育研究还未达到成熟但拥有许多学术领域的属性。他为那些在高等教育中准备进入高等教育的人进行了大量的竞赛。他还指出，大约有八百位教授认为自己是高等教育的教授。这表明，这些教授会轻易同意Mileti（2003）：当人们谈论什么是。我们需要研究高等教育和高等教育作为一个研究领域的特征。虽然在过去的几十年里，很少有关于高等教育的文学作为一个研究领域，新的研究表明在目前相反。霍布斯和弗兰西斯（1973）和弗兰西斯和霍布斯（1974）认为，在高等教育中，学科期刊的理论研究是罕见的。他们还发现，很少有明显的使用的理论成果凯勒姆斯期刊文献（1975（3），135-154）。Goodchild（ND）表明，有越来越多的文献，在高等教育领域的各个部分的交易。所以，这表明我们确实在朝着一个方向前进。
英国哈佛代写Essay:新兴的研究领域
As an emerging field of study there are many challenges and questions that evoke when one declares higher education as a field of study. Some people like Dennis Mileti (2003) could easily declare that since people talked about Emergency Management as a discipline, "therefore it is."Philips (2003:2). In defining higher education as a field of study there are questions that will engage us for years to come as they have for the years ago. "Position papers will be written, perspective challenged, debates entered in curriculum committees, turf battles waged in graduate councils" Phillips (2003:2). The debate is sometimes reduced to the question of whose definition of 'field of study' to be used. Philips (2003:2) suggests that we need to pause and examine the past while contemplating the future.How far we are with higher education as a field of study and what direction is it taking. We need to look back and say where we come from. according to Goodchild (nd) the study of higher education has not yet reached maturity but possesses many of the attributes of scholarly field. He contests that programmes designed to prepare persons entry in higher education exist in profusion. He also states that there are approximately eight hundred professors who think of themselves as professors on higher education. This suggests that these professors would have easily agreed with Mileti (2003) in that when people talk of something therefore it is. We need to look at what characterizes higher education and higher education as a field of study in particular. Although in the past few decades there was very little literature regarding higher education as a field of study, new research suggests the opposite at the present. Hobbs and Francis (1973) and Francis and Hobbs (1974) were able to that the theoretical research available in the disciplinary journals was rare in the higher education. They also found that there was little apparent use of periodical literature of the theoretical findings Kellems (1975(3), 135-154). Goodchild (nd) suggests that there is a growing literature that deals with various parts of higher education domain. So, this suggests that we are indeed moving in a direction.

• 上一篇：哈佛代写Essay 组织结构的分权结构
• 下一篇：哈佛代写Essay:定性数据